The negative effects of milk products on the human body Essay

The negative effects of milk products on the human body - Essay Example On the other hand, mothers' milk has six to ten times as much of the essential fatty acids, especially linoleic acid which cow's milk does not have. While animals stop taking in milk from weaning however, man is known to continue with his fill, and is in fact the only specie that drinks the milk of other species. On television healthy, beautiful people claim milk is good for the body. Dieticians insist that one has got to have milk to have calcium. Milk producers likewise advocate the benefits of calcium, vitamin D, and other nutrients. Meanwhile, mothers insist on their children to drink their milk, and schools include milk in their feeding programs. For many years also, people are taught that dairy products make up an "essential food group." And yet amidst this din, there are those who claim that milk is poison, and mention possible links to cancer or other diseases. Yet, people have grown so comfortable consuming milk and eating milk products, and for this, many do not give a second thought to the possible negative effects of milk. Worse still, they do not want to give up milk. ... n intestinal colic, intestinal irritation, intestinal bleeding, anemia, allergic reactions in infants and children as well as infections such as salmonella. There is the fear of viral infection with bovine leukemia virus or an AIDS-like virus as well as concern for childhood diabetes. Also discussed in these literatures is contamination of milk by blood and pus as well as a variety of chemicals and insecticides. Among children the problems were allergy, ear and tonsillar infections, bedwetting, asthma, intestinal bleeding, colic and childhood diabetes. In adults the problems seemed centered more around heart disease and arthritis, allergy, sinusitis, and the more serious questions of leukemia, lymphoma and cancer. According to Kradjian, none of the authors said milk was a perfect food. As if to concur to findings that milk is not good for the human body, its composition is now being sought to be altered but that it is accepted that only one institution is incapable of doing this venture.3 The following discussions include why milk and dairy products are bad, the effects of ingesting milk and dairy products, and the alternatives. It also includes the stand of the government on these products and the stand of doctors. A conclusion at the end repeats the paper's thesis that milk is bad for the body due to these named deficiencies and negative effects on the human body. Why milk and dairy products are bad Not a perfect food. That milk is a perfect food is a dairy industry myth.4 Outside of milk containing a wide range of disease-causing substances that can have a cumulative negative effect on all who consume it, milk lacks other elements.5 In 1930 Dr. G.O. Burr in Minnesota working with rats found that linoleic acid deficiencies created a deficiency syndrome. This

World Architecture and Reflective Practice Essay

World Architecture and Reflective Practice - Essay Example World Architecture and Reflective Practice This break produced by Utzon’s dismissal from the project in 1966 in the face of contentious outlay and time overruns, and the architects re-involvement with his project thirty years later to oversee future transformations to the Sydney Opera House. A key cultural centre for Sydney and its sitting at Bennelong Point has received constant debate since 1940s. Utzon’s design impression engaged unexpected architectural outlines and required solutions that demanded new technologies and materials. Up till now there was strength and enthusiasm to discover new perceptions in the postwar years in Australia (Anderson, 2005). There was an impulsion in some camps to reform Sydney into a new cultural capital and this increased following the decision to host the 1956 Olympic Games in Melbourne. A further major catalyst behind the origin of the Sydney Opera House was the then Prime Minister vision of creating the Sydney Opera House that would have huge cultural effects on Australian s ociety. The Sydney Opera House is frequently viewed as being built in three phases and this is important in comprehending the history of the three major features of its architectural constitution, including the platform, the arched shells and the glass walls as well as the interior. Architect Utzon thought of all the general design and managed the construction of the platform and the arched shells. The glossy walls and interiors were design and their construction was monitored by architect Peter Hall and NSW regime. Ove Arup & Partners offered the engineering knowledge for all three phases of construction, working with the construction contractors. Design was directly tangled and this was a different aspect of the Sydney Opera House. Utzon’s innovative design in unison with his revolutionary technique to the building of the structure nurtured an outstanding collaborative and inventive climate. His cooperative model marked a breach from traditional architectural practice at th e period. The distinction of architecture and engineering that had started in the nineteenth century did not react to the sophisticated nature of modern architecture. The determination for new architectural outlines utilizing new materials required new approaches and architects in some states has began pursuing more inventive contribution from engineers. The scope of construction of the Sydney Opera House was immense. The design from the location and the construction of the shell structure demanded the world’s biggest crane. The Sydney Opera House took sixteen-years to construct at a projected $102 million. Likely the most important aspect of the entire Sydney Opera House tale is the magnificent fact that in a modern society with all its checks and balances (Andersen, 2005). The Sydney Opera is one of Australia’s iconic structures and it acknowledged across the globe. It has become an international embalm of Australia. The Danish architect Jorn Utzon won the architectu re competition established by NSW government for the structure in 1957, and the construction began 1959. The design created by Utzon was architectural feat that never been witnessed before. Utzon was still capable of changing the geometry of his design even after 4 years of building. For that reason his new design was able to save time and cost of construction. The project experienced a lot of delays and cost over-runs that were uncertainly blamed upon Utzon. In 1956 a new regime was appointed in NSW and